According to the American Cancer Society’s most recent estimate for 2009, 11,270 new cases of invasive cervical cancer will be diagnosed and 4,070 women will die from the disease.
Prior to 1955 cervical cancer was one of the most common causes of cancer death for American women. As a result of the development of the Pap smear screening test between 1955 and 1992, the cervical cancer death rate declined by 74%.
Since half of the cervical cancer cases arise in patients who have never had a Pap smear or whose last Pap smear preceded diagnosis of invasive cancer by more than five years, the problem is not that too many Pap smears are being done but that not enough Pap smears are being done.
Nevertheless, the guidelines for screening of Pap smears have resulted in fewer Pap smears being done. For a test that is misinterpreted when it shows abnormalities between 20 and 40% of the time, frequent repetition of the test is needed to assure one appropriate interpretation. Even when an appropriate interpretation of Pap smears is made and abnormalities are found which require treatment, the appropriate treatment is not given 10% of the time.
For a test associated with little cost, and which is essentially risk free, the pressure to limit the performance of even this test is clearly present.
Matthew Mintz, M.D. writes at KevinMD.com medical web blog on November 17, 2009, “Why Doctors are Doing So Many Unnecessary Pap Smears.” In his opinion piece, Dr. Mintz asserts that the Pap smear is a symbol of our healthcare system’s problems, yet the only evidence he quotes in support of this proposition is a study from the Annuals of Internal Medicine which demonstrates doctors are doing more frequent Pap smears on women than some guidelines recommend.
The fact that more Pap smears are being done does not mean that they are needless and they certainly are not harmful.
When even well-informed physicians can reach such wrong-headed conclusions it is not surprising that it is so difficult to fix the healthcare system.
Where is the alarm about the high rate at which Pap smears are wrongly interpreted as negative when in fact they show ominous changes?
Not all screening tests have been as successful as the Pap smear. The fact that we could have for example better screening tests for breast cancer than a mammogram does not negate the importance of women having an option to have a mammogram. We should be searching for better screening tests improving the performance of existing texts and not failing to screen with the tests available simply because the tests are imperfect.
With such controversy swirling about healthcare reform it is difficult to hear the truth in the midst of all the noise that is being made. Staying well informed and being skeptical is the safest approach to receiving appropriate medical care.
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
I’m very glad that you decided to share with our readers your comments. It is very easy for a woman who has never shared your experience or known anyone in your circumstances, to minimize the importance of early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
I find it interesting that you described negative Pap smears on more than one occasion prior to the Pap smear which led to your diagnosis. In your remarks you refer to others whose diagnosis also followed negative Pap smears and who were less fortunate, and that their disease was advanced at the time diagnosis was made.
Though Pap smears have dramatically reduced deaths from cervical cancer, interpretive errors with respect to the reading of the Pap smears has on occasion resulted in needless delay in diagnosis.
I have represented numerous women who after investigation were proven to have had an avoidable delay in diagnosis. It is my experience in these cases that makes me so sensitive to your remarks.
Thank you again for commenting.
For further information please read the articles appearing at my web site.
I was diagnosed with advanced invasive cervical cancer (squamous cell, stage 2B with metastasis to two pelvic lymph nodes – 50% 5-year survival rate) after having a solid history of negative pap smears. I became sexually abstinent in 1996, but continued getting routine pap smears. I may have skipped a year once or twice, but I did have at least 3 normal pap smears in a row in 2003, 2004, & 2005. Then in 2006, my Dr. found a large tumor. I believe that if I had not gone to have a pap smear in 2006, I would not be here today. In fact, although I have been “cancer-free” (no evidence of disease”) for 3 years now, I still have a 50% chance of surviving the next two years. I want to advise every woman who has EVER been sexually active to continue getting ANNUAL pap smears even if the results are always negative (“normal”). I know they say that it is rare for this to happen (cervical cancer), but when it happens to you, it doesn’t really matter how rare or common it is. I know of at least 2 other women who had a history of normal pap smears prior to a cervical cancer diagnosis which was made too late, and those women are no longer alive. After suffering through chemotherapy, radiation, along with the horrible and some long lasting side effects that come with treatment, becoming infertile, and being put into instant menopause at the age of 38, I can assure you that the discomfort and financial cost of a pap smear pales in comparison.
Well Done! I Like it!
This is an unreliable test that with annual testing sends almost all women for biopsies in her lifetime, with only a very small number having any sign of malignancy. Two yearly testing sends 77% of women for biopsies, three yearly – 65% and even 5 yearly is 55%.
Where did you get these numbers? Colposcopy should only be performed when a high grade lesion or atypical cells suggesting a high grade lesion is found. This is an in frequent event. Further, colposcopy does not result in any biopsy unless evidence of a precancerous lesion is confirmed. 90% of these precancerous lesions will progress to invasive cancer if not treated.
The reason that relatively few cases of cancer are diagnosed each year in America (15,000) each year is because of the success of treating precancerous lesions found by pap smears.
Pap smears are not harmful – what a statement!
Many women find a pap smear an ordeal and some women refuse to have them at all. Aside from that, pap smears are unreliable and lead to over-treatment with LEEP and biopsies. The risk of this cancer and the benefits of this testing have been completely misrepresented to women.
I think this shows a disgusting lack of regard for women and their rights.
This cancer is uncommon, always was – look at the figures. Don’t talk in terms of “75% reduction” or “deaths halved”, talk about absolute risk.
This is an unreliable test that with annual testing sends almost all women for biopsies in her lifetime, with only a very small number having any sign of malignancy. Two yearly testing sends 77% of women for biopsies, three yearly – 65% and even 5 yearly is 55%.
Your chance of unnecessary and potentially harmful biopsies is FAR greater than the low risk of cancer. (near zero for a low risk woman)
Some of those women will be left with continuing health problems.
Overscreening and screening women under 25 causes lots of damage for very little benefit. Young women produce VERY high numbers of false positives simply because their bodies are changing and these changes are interpreted as abnormal – these young women don’t need medical intervention. it is to protect these young women from harm that countries like the UK don’t screen before 25 and the Netherlands and Finland, not before 30.
Finland has the lowest rates of cervical cancer in the world and sends the smallest number of women for biopsies – they offer screening from age 30 and then 5 yearly to 60. My low risk Finnish friend does not have screening at all.
Angela Raffle, UK cancer screening expert released some figures that puts the risk into perspective – 1000 women need regular screening for 35 years to save ONE woman from cervical cancer.
When the risk of this cancer in an unscreened population is about 1.58% and a low risk woman has a near zero chance of getting this cancer AND this test so often leads to over-treatment…only one person can make the decision to accept those odds – the woman herself.
Of course, the benefits of screening have always been exaggerated as well as the risk of this cancer & the risks have been concealed…
There is no respect for a woman’s right to choose – whether she wants testing. Informed consent is totally disregarded and more than that, women are pressured and coerced into testing. Coerced by the unethical tying of birth control with cancer screening. They have nothing to do with each other – this is a tactic to FORCE screening. Even the medical associations, WHO and the USF&DA all say this test is not needed for the initiation and continuing use of the Pill. Can you imagine compulsory rectal exams for all men wanting Viagra or antibiotics? No say in whether they want testing. Yet that is accepted in women’s health – screening is demanded with no risk or unbiased information, it is never offered…
We need a major change in women’s health – it’s time for honesty and some respect.