Online Journal watch is a publication which surveys medical newly published medical literature and comments on various relevant medical issues. One of the January’s postings reported upon a study of patients being evaluated by cardiac CT scan. The study addressed, among other things, the value of utilizing information made available by reason of the study having been performed, though such information was not the reason for the scan being done.
The editors of Journal Watch published my remarks under the title captioning this post. For my remarks see Journal Watch .
Return To Most Recent News
The Archives of Internal Medicine, June 22, 2009, published results of a retrospective medical record review involving nineteen community based and four academic medical center primary care practices. The researchers were intent upon examining how frequently patients were not informed of clinically significant abnormal outpatient test results. The researcher’s conclusion was that it is common for patients to be uninformed of significant abnormal outpatient test results and they suggest a simple process currently not being followed by most primary caregivers to correct what the researchers see as a problem.
Remarkably, they fail to comment on an additional meaningful conclusion that can be arrived at from examining the same data. The doctors who didn’t inform their patients must not have done anything about the abnormal lab results. Surely, it is not possible that physicians failed to inform patients of significant abnormal lab results only in cases where the lab results, though abnormal, suggested no need for a different course of medical treatment. Perhaps a more important issue for these researchers to have examined is whether the results were communicated to the doctor and whether the doctor incorporated those results in the formulation of each patient’s continued and future course of care.
In these circumstances, a patient’s safeguard of last resort is their own interest in their medical care. Patients need to be attentive not just in the outpatient setting but also in the hospital setting. A patient should not assume that because there are a number of people who seem involved in their care, doctors, nurses, etc., that someone in fact is aware of all clinical events and test results and is thoughtfully guiding the patient’s care with a professional interest in the best possible outcome.
Learn more about abnormal pap smears.
Return To Most Recent News
